Daniil Ostapenkov vs Egor Noskin Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W W L L
Form
L L W L W L L L W LHead-2-Head: Ostapenkov 1 - 0 Noskin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ostapenkov winning 2 and Noskin winning 0. The last match between Ostapenkov and Noskin was at the M25 Nur-Sultan, 12-07-2022, Q3, Hard with Daniil Ostapenkov getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniil Ostapenkov | 1 |
| Egor Noskin | 0 |
M25 Nur-Sultan(12-07-2022)
6
4
6
4
| Ostapenkov | Stats | Noskin |
|---|---|---|
| 76% (19-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 898 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 840 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 21 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (102-58) | Career Total W/L | 53% (63-55) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Nishikori VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ostapenkov VS Noskin H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Egor Noskin
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Ostapenkov VS Noskin H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:17:0 | Average Match Time | 1:17:0 |
| 55% (32/58) | 1st Serve % | 62% (41/66) |
| 69% (22/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (20/41) |
| 50% (13/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 52% (34/66) | Return Points Win % | 40% (23/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniil Ostapenkov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
52 of
68)
15
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Daniil Bogatov
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Leonardo Borrelli
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
13
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Yukun Wang
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Federico Bondioli
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Martin Krumich
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
17 of
31)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
40
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Egor Noskin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 5-7 7-6(4) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 7-6(3) 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Timur Maulenov
Player
Egor Noskin
54%
(
57 of
105)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Egor Noskin
Player
Andrey Nelich
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Egor Noskin
55%
(
57 of
104)
1st Serve %
46%
(
34 of
74)
3
Aces
3
12
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
36%
(
17 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
100
Total Points Won
78
|
5-7 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Egor Noskin
Player
Sidharth Rawat
46%
(
51 of
112)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
99)
7
Aces
9
12
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
49%
(
30 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Zgirovsky
Player
Egor Noskin
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
11
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
12 of
43)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Egor Noskin
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (102/58) | Win/Loss | 53% (63/55) |
| 63% (218/126) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (144/124) |
| 57% (1721/1302) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1314/1234) |
| 68% (84/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (27/21) |
| 48% (15/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) |
| 50% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (19/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 442 | Aces Total | 210 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 293 | Total Double Faults | 302 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 313.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 340.75 |
| 63% (4171/6659) | 1st Serve % | 57% (2694/4758) |
| 68% (2833/4171) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (1838/2694) |
| 47% (1175/2499) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (927/2064) |
| 47% (362/776) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (237/551) |
| 43% (2917/6820) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2055/4887) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 64% (101/56) | Futures W/L | 53% (62/54) |
| 64% (100/156) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (62/117) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (8/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 32% (7/22) |
| 43% (12/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (14/33) |
| 92% (106/98) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (68/57) |
| 8% (106/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (68/11) |
| 7% (54/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (50/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
